A
Darwin Template is better than a conventional modeling system
because it selfproves. It is able to selfprove because its
structure is evolutionary rather than the more
conventional
devolutionary.
The
"start point" in a conventional modeling system is "here and now"
which means, in cosmology research, the field of view is
devolutionary, being mostly directed downward in size and
backward in time.
In the Malta Template, the start point is placed as far back in the
history of the
Universe as can be justified by facts and is thus evolutionary
with argument number one in
chapter number one being the foundation stone upon which the
rest of the template is
built. Starting from that foundation, the template universe evolves
into a form that is identical to the Universe we
see about us. Therein lies the selfproof. If the template doesn't
evolve into a Universe
exactly like ours, or if aspects of the template don't evolve into
aspects that
match reality exactly, the template is wrong and must be reconsidered
until it does.
In
selfproving, every aspect of the Current Paradigm Model is set out
for direct comparison with the equivalent aspect in the the Malta Template. The comparison for each aspect has a
three part structure, thus:
- Current Paradigm:
This is the most popular description of the aspect being considered. To be as impartial as possible, the
description is lifted
from other publications, with each being named and
dated.
- Malta Template: This is the description of the aspect being considered that has evolved in the Malta Template.
- Commentary:
The two descriptions are here compared and any similarities
and disparities noted. Where there are disparities, the reasons
are established and
the justification for the Template version is
made.
The
Template does indeed evolve into a Universe that is
exactly like
the one we live in, suggesting that most of the aspects
dealt with are accurate even when they disagree with the Current Paradigm.
|