The Current Paradigm description of globular clusters is devolutionary in that globular clusters are identified, named/numbered, and speculated upon. The Malta Template, being evolutionary, comes upon them as a part of the growth cycle of galactic blackholes.

Globular clusters either circulate within, or are passing through a larger galaxy's gravitysheath. Each cluster has its own gravitysheath and gravitysheath interface and is therefore both a part of the structure of a galaxy and a finite structure in its own right. Within its gravitysheath interface, a cluster has a gravitonosphere that we can't see surrounding the group of stars that we can see. Each star has a blackhole composite core, a gravitonosphere, a gravitysheath, and a gravitysheath interface.

Any galaxy that is directly visible to us is understable (stable and overstable galaxies are either dim to us or are only visible indirectly. The default structure for an understable galaxy is centrifugal with gravitonospheric gravitonstreams rising at the equator, moving at high level to the poles where they fall and return to the equator at low level. The dynamic mass of the gravitonstreams is highest at the base of the equatorial disk and lowest at high level over the poles. An understable galaxy is ejecting its most energetic gravitons across its gravitysheath interface, thus differentially losing mass and energy, and thus moving toward stability.

Every globular cluster inside the gravitonosphere of a galaxy is in a gravitonstream. Gravitons from that gravitonstream cross the cluster's gravitysheath interface and thus become subject to the gravitypull of the core of stars. Consequently, they accelerate. They are still accelerating as they reach and cross the gravitysheath interfaces of the stars themselves. As they plunge down through the star's gravitonospheres they are still accelerating, exchanging potentialspeed for realspeed.

No matter what the realspeed of the gravitons in the galactic gravitonstream might be as they cross a cluster's gravitysheath interface, by the time they reach the gravitoncore surface of one of the cluster's stars, they are moving a great deal faster. Fast enough to render the cluster stars greatly understable. As long as the cluster remains within one of the galactic gravitonstreams its stars cannot help but be understable.

Stars which are greatly understable consist of greatly understable atoms. Understable atoms have dense and energetic gravitonospheres which prohibit any joining together of light atoms to form heavier atoms. This is why globular cluster stars have spectra that are almost entirely from lighter atoms.

This explanation runs counter to the Current Paradigm in which the age of a star is generally thought to be determined by its spectrum with young stars having spectra consisting of light atom emissions and with any increase in the heaviness of the atom emissions equating to increasing age. Per the Malta Template, it is entirely possible for the globular cluster stars to be extremely old, with their light atom spectra being due to their being engorged with gravitons from the galactic gravitonstream and thus being made extremely understable.

Confirmation of the Malta Template description comes from the way that not all globular clusters appear to be of the same "age". Those located in the equatorial disc contain very "young" stars while those in the galactic halo contain stars which are older. It is no coincidence that the dynamic mass of the galactic gravitonstreams is highest in the equatorial disc, progressively slowing as the gravitonstreams  move into the halo and being at its lowest with the gravitonstream high over the galactic poles.

A similar confirmation comes from the density of globular clusters. Clusters of stars are at their least densely packed, and fewest in number, in the equatorial disc. In the halo, the clusters contain more stars and the stars themselves are more densely packed. This is entirely to be expected. In the equatorial disc, the stars are being intensely engorged by the upwelling high dynamic mass gravitonstream. Consequently, each star throws an intense gravitonosphere that pushes the stars apart and can push some stars out of the cluster's gravitysheath altogether. In the halo, where the dynamic mass of the gravitonstreams is lower, the stars throw gravitonospheres that are less extensive and less intense, allowing the mutual gravitypull of the stars to pull them closer together. At the same time, the more extensive gravitysheath allows more stars to be retained.

Perhaps the greatest confirmation of the Malta Template's description comes from putting the existence of globular clusters into an evolutionary context. One interpretation in the Current Paradigm is that the clusters are star nurseries that are providing new young stars for the galaxy. The truth is almost entirely the opposite.

The larger galaxies are blackholes. As the Universe evolves, the blackholes increase in mass. They do this by merging with other blackholes and by absorbing any stray matter that drifts into their gravitysheaths. Big blackholes merge with similar blackholes and eat smaller ones. The Milky Way blackhole appears to be in the process of merging with the Andromeda blackhole. At the same time each is absorbing any smaller galaxies, star clusters, planets, gas clouds, and graviton clouds that come their way.

Globular clusters are small galaxies and star clusters that are in the process of being eaten. One way or another they are being digested, turned into material that can be used by the blackhole to stabilise itself - probably eventually stabilising at a greater mass but not necessarily so.

On entering a galaxy's gravitysheath, clusters are able to retain some integrity but the closer they get to the galaxy's gravitoncore (and over time they will get closer) the increasingly engorged they become. The end result is always the same:  the cluster is broken up as the mutual gravitypull of the stars is progressively weakened. Some of the stars in the cluster may become so engorged that they dissipate from their own understability but most will become just another of the stars that surround the gravitoncore. Once stars are free of their cluster, of course, they age and die in much the same way as any other star.