THE MALTA COSMOLOGY TEMPLATE



Chapter 05 - Darkmatter






PARTS



Chapter
Home


Part 1
Centrifugal Blackholes


Part 2
Axial Blackholes


Part 3
Teelospheres as Darkmatter


Part 4
Selfproof
Home



















Darkmatter Selfproofs

SELFPROOF 0502 – PERIHELION PRECESSION OF MERCURY


CURRENT COSMOLOGY MODEL

Under Newtonian physics, a two-body system consisting of a lone object orbiting a spherical mass would trace out an ellipse with the spherical mass at a focus. The point of closest approach, called the periapsis (or, as the central body in our Solar System is the sun, perihelion), is fixed. A number of effects in our solar system cause the perihelia of planets to precess (rotate) around the sun. The principal cause is the presence of other planets which perturb each other's orbit. Another (much more minor) effect is solar oblateness.


Mercury deviates from the precession predicted from these Newtonian effects. This anomalous rate of precession of the perihelion of Mercury's orbit was first recognised in 1859 as a problem in celestial mechanics by Urbain Le Verrier. His reanalysis of available time observations of transits of Mercury over the Sun's disk from 1697 to 1848 showed that the actual rate of the precession disagreed from that predicted from Newton's theory by 38” (arc seconds) per tropical century (later re-estimated at 4'3”). A number of ad hoc and ultimately unsuccessful solutions were proposed but they tended to introduce more problems. In general relativity, this remaining precession, or change of orientation of the orbital ellipse within its orbital plane, is explained by gravitation being mediated by the curvature of spacetime. Einstein showed that general relativity agrees closely with the observed amount of perihelion shift. This was a powerful factor motivating the adoption of general relativity. (Wikipedia 25 Aug 2012)


MALTA COSMOLOGY TEMPLATE

  • In a blackhole, the teelcore's gravitypull acts on the teelosphere and the teelosphere's gravitypull acts on the teelcore.  (see Argument 0514)
  • A smaller object within the teelosphere of a larger object is subject to the gravitypulls of the larger object's teelcore and its teelosphere. Depending on where the smaller object is within the teelosphere of the larger object, the gravitypull of the teelosphere weakens or strengthens that of the teelcore.  (see Argument 0515)  
COMMENTARY
  • The Sun is a gravity bound accretion of particles. Each of the particles has a teelosphere and ultimately, so too has the Sun. 
  • The Sun is currently understable and is shedding mass and energy in its solar wind and photons - although its principle means of shedding mass and energy is by ejecting teels. 
  • The Sun's teelosphere is centrifugal which means that surrounding its equator there is a dense and rapidly rising disk of teels. 
  • Since it cannot be seen, its presence is only indirectly detectable in the effect it has on objects that move within it. The density and the speed of the teels in the disk falls with distance from the Sun per the Inverse Square Law so it is only easily detectable relatively close to the Sun. It is detectable in the perihelion precession of Mercury.
  • The cause of the Mercury precession is actually a multiprocess:

    • Mercury is riding on the upward pressure of the rising teelstream in the same way a pingpong ball rides on a jet of water.
    • Mercury is subject to the gravitypull of the rising teelstream that has gone beyond its orbit.
  • This is not a rejection of general relativity but a clarification of the cause of the precession. 
    • General Relativity attributes it to the curvature of space. 
    • The Malta Cosmology Template attributes it to the teelosphere surrounding the Sun. (see Selfproof C0114 - Space)  
  • While the terms are different the numbers are much the same.






Comments and suggestions:  peter.ed.winchester@gmail.com

Copyright 2013 Peter (Ed) Winchester



REVISIONS

03 July 2014 - Page revised to 3-section format.